Are Canadian Officials Culpable? Unraveling COVID Vaccine Misinformation and Negligence in Canada

Well, well, it seems like our beloved Canadian officials have once again dazzled us with their impeccable handling of the COVID-19 vaccine situation. Who needs accurate information and transparency when we can have rushed changes to safety standards and a healthy dose of suppression? It’s truly heartwarming to see our government and trusted institutions working tirelessly to ensure that we, the vulnerable public, are left in the dark while they make strategic moves to allay our fears. Bravo, Canada! Keep up the great work in protecting us from inconvenient truths.

In a groundbreaking legal move, a Canadian mother who suffered severe adverse effects from the COVID-19 vaccine has filed a lawsuit against the Canadian government and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC). Carrie Sakamoto, now afflicted with permanent Bell’s Palsy, is seeking $10.5 million in damages for what she alleges to be misinformation and negligence. This lawsuit sheds light on the rushed changes made to vaccine safety standards at the beginning of the pandemic and the subsequent suppression of vaccine injury information.

The Rushed Changes to Vaccine Safety Standards

Sakamoto’s lawyer, Eva Chipiuk, emphasizes the alarming changes the Canadian government made to vaccine safety standards early in the COVID-19 crisis. Chipiuk revealed that while health officials were publicly asserting the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines, they were simultaneously modifying the approval standards. The requirement for the vaccines to be both safe and effective was removed, raising concerns about the integrity of the vaccine approval process.

Chipiuk highlights the government’s acknowledgment of the rushed contracts with vaccine manufacturers, which lacked normal standards and provided additional indemnities in favor of the manufacturers. This revelation supports Sakamoto’s claim that she was misled by the government and health agencies into believing the vaccine was safe.

Trusted Advice Leading to Permanently Disability

Carrie Sakamoto, a mother of three, trusted the advice of health officials and followed their recommendation to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Tragically, she experienced permanent disability following her second dose. This devastating outcome underscores the gravity of the situation and raises questions about the accuracy of the information provided to the public.

Empowered Canadians and The Institute for Freedom and Justice have joined forces to support Sakamoto’s legal case. Their involvement reflects the growing concerns among Canadians who have experienced vaccine injuries and the urgent need for justice and transparency.

Negligence, Misinformation, and Suppression of Vaccine Injury Information

The lawsuit explicitly accuses various entities, including the Federal Minister of Health, the Chief Public Health Officer of Canada, Health Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada, Dr. Celia Lourenco, Alberta Health Services, and the CBC. These organizations are accused of negligence, spreading misinformation, and suppressing crucial information related to vaccine injuries associated with COVID-19 vaccines.

The lawsuit highlights the Health Minister’s duty to provide accurate and well-researched information to Canadians before recommending any experimental drug. It argues that the trust between the public and health experts was broken, and relevant information regarding adverse vaccine effects was deliberately withheld during a time when Canadians were particularly vulnerable.

Government Knowledge and Vaccine-Related Injuries

Recent revelations have surfaced, indicating that the Canadian government, under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, was aware of COVID vaccine injuries and actively strategized to alleviate public fears. The emergence of a secret memo further substantiates the claim that the government possessed knowledge about the risks associated with the vaccines.

Sakamoto’s case is not an isolated incident. A study conducted in the United Kingdom last year revealed a significant increase in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) within two to four weeks after administering the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. Many Canadian provinces ceased administering the AstraZeneca vaccine shortly after its approval due to reported cases of blood clots.

Seeking Justice for Health Losses

Carrie Sakamoto’s lawsuit is just one among many cases emerging in Canada, where individuals seek justice for health damages caused by the experimental COVID-19 vaccines. Another recent case involved a man from British Columbia who sued AstraZeneca, federal and provincial governments, and a pharmacy after experiencing adverse effects from the vaccine. Furthermore, hundreds of Canadian military members filed a $500 million lawsuit challenging COVID vaccine mandates.

As these cases unfold, it becomes evident that Canadians are increasingly looking to their government for accountability and transparency regarding the safety and risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccines. The legal actions aim to shed light on the potential negligence, misinformation, and suppression of vaccine injury information, demanding justice for those who have suffered adverse effects.

In conclusion, Carrie Sakamoto’s lawsuit against the Canadian government and the CBC brings attention to the alleged misinformation and negligence surrounding COVID-19 vaccines. The case underscores the rushed changes to vaccine safety standards and the suppression of vital information. As more individuals come forward with vaccine-related injuries, it becomes imperative to address these concerns and ensure transparency in the vaccination process. Only through accountability and accurate information can trust be restored between the public and health authorities.