In a bold move against the imposition of left-leaning ideologies, Alberta lawyer Roger Song has filed a lawsuit against the Law Society of Alberta (LSA). The lawsuit challenges the recent mandate by LSA that requires members to undergo training centered around critical race theory, gender theory, and intersectionality.
On October 27, Song took a stand, emphasizing the unsuitability of these ideologies within the professional realm. He vehemently argues that such political ideologies are not a true reflection of reality and hold no value in Canadian society’s moral fabric.
The updated rulebook from LSA, dated October 5, 2023, grants the authority to prescribe specific continuing professional development requirements for its members, with failure to comply resulting in automatic suspension.
Song’s lawsuit raises critical concerns about the infringement on lawyers’ rights to maintain their diverse viewpoints, which he asserts are protected under the Canadian Constitution. He contends that compelling adherence to a singular political ideology could tarnish the profession’s reputation and hinder lawyers’ ability to serve their clients faithfully.
Supported by the Council of Alberta Lawyers, Song’s case presents an “expert opinion” from Dr. Joanna Williams, reinforcing the argument against the imposition of these ideologies. Emphasizing the importance of upholding constitutional rights, Song highlights the damaging impact of such mandates on the legal profession.
Drawing from personal experience in China, where conformity to state ideologies was enforced, Song underscores the significance of freedom of thought and expression. He firmly advocates for these freedoms as crucial pillars of genuine democracy and effective systems for truth-seeking.
Warning against the destructive nature of socialism, Song draws a parallel between socialism and the current emphasis on ‘equity’ in modern social justice movements. He stresses the importance of maintaining a diverse range of perspectives and ideologies within the legal profession.
In essence, Song’s legal challenge marks a crucial battle for the preservation of diverse perspectives and freedoms within the legal landscape, positioning it as a significant test of constitutional rights against ideological mandates.
The great WHO done it? Sounds like a game of Clue, right? Please take time…
It really is amazing... It really is amazing when someone does a search on the…
In the beginning of time, American time, it was the wild untamed natural beauty of…
Notice Who and What is missing in the national discussion? We would like to bring…
Perspective and awareness is essential Right now look around what do you notice? In the…
One Small Into - One Giant Leap into Awareness and Understanding In this endeavour, today,…
This website uses cookies.