Forget reality TV dramas– WHO’s behind-the-scenes dynamics are the real nail-biter! If you thought global health was just about lab coats and stethoscopes, think again. WHO’s metamorphosis from a united front to a tug-of-war between nations and privte interests is like watching a soap opera– just replace the dramatic stares with budget debates. But hey, who knew saving lives could be this thrilling?
The COVID-19 outbreak set a precedent in global history with its implementation of widespread lockdowns, border closures, and extensive school shutdowns. In stark contrast, the pandemic of 1969, often overshadowed by the exuberance of the Woodstock music festival, targeted a younger demographic without causing the extensive societal and economic upheavals witnessed today.
The extraordinary measures adopted during the COVID-19 response disrupted supply chains and healthcare accessibility on a massive scale. Regrettably, these actions led to an alarming surge in early marriages and the exploitation of women, a steep decline in children’s education, a widening chasm of financial disparities, and and a persistent increase in educational inequality, thereby shaping future societal disparities.
In the wake of COVID-19, numerous low-income nations faced burgeoning debts and economic recessions, inevitably curtailing their future life expectancies. Alarmingly, mortality rates among children rose, encompassing diseases that were previously focal points, such as malaria, accentuating the gravity of the situation.
The World Health Organization (WHO), established in the late 1940s, functions as the primary health agency under the United Nations. Tasked with coordinating global health standards and fostering international data sharing, WHO extends support to health systems in countries lacking technical expertise.
With country offices across the globe, six regional offices, and its global headquarters in Geneva, WHO operates as a hierarchical institution. At its helm stands the Director General (DG), overseeing a considerable workforce of several thousand employees and a staggering annual budget nearing $3.5 billion.
In principle, the WHO operates under the governance of member nations, each exercising one vote at the World Health Assembly (WHA), typically convened annually. This democratic approach, however, assigns equal voting rights irrespective of a country’s population, granting equal say to nations regardless of their demographic size.
Historically reliant on member countries’ contributions, WHO’s financial landscape has undergone significant transformation over the past two decades. The emergence of substantial private funding from individuals and corporations, both directly and indirectly through allied international health organizations, has altered the funding dynamics.
The WHO’s financial trajectory witnessed a shift from primarily core funding to predominantly ‘directed’ funding. This novel approach allows funders to dictate the specified areas for fund utilization, often delineating the exact activities to be pursued. Consequently, WHO acts as a conduit, executing the intended activities of its funders.
While the WHO ostensibly remains under the purview of member nations, the day-to-day priorities are increasingly influenced by individual countries and private entities. The advent of stringent conflict of interest regulations regarding private sector engagement has seemingly waned, paving the way for closer collaborations between WHO and private and corporate entities.
Does Canada need a visionary Minister of National Defence ? What would that be like?…
Is the United Nations engaged in war and genocide against Canada? We will take a…
COVID "VACCINE" is often called a bio-weapon. Some may be surprised, however take a look…
That is a bold question, right? A little audacity now and then is a good…
We have some really interesting events in Canada, all of which involved considerable degrees of…
This is a work in progress, in particular research concerning "woke" being super imposed in…
This website uses cookies.